BERLIN: Two German men who came up with a pink glove to help females dispose of tampons have sparked a backlash on social media, with critics panning the solution as worthless and sexist.
At a menstrual cramp-inducing 11.96 euros ($14.31) for a pack of 48, the Pinky is a plastic glove that doubles as a disposal bag to offer a “discreet remedy for pads and tampons”, according to the item web-site.
Andre Ritterswuerden and Eugen Raimkulow, who fulfilled in the military, presented their product or service on Monday on the German model of the Dragons’ Den Television demonstrate in which inventors pitch to likely traders, drawing 30,000 euros from an entrepreneur. But the two adult men speedily discovered by themselves going through a slew of disparaging reviews on social media, with the hashtag #PinkyGate trending on Twitter on Wednesday.
“We both of those actually do understand women,” Raimkulow said on the Tv demonstrate, basing their skills on each getting married and obtaining lived with women of all ages in flat shares.
From time to time, he would “dare to glance in the rubbish bin”, he stated. “Immediately after a though it just smells uncomfortable. And you can see it, simply because it begins seeping by means of the paper.”
“Each day there is a further ineffective products for the vagina,” tweeted Canadian-American gynaecologist Jennifer Gunter, author of The Vagina Bible. “I will need to throw (the ebook) at these idiots,” she reported.
Even the conservative daily Die Welt waded in, pointing out that plastic gloves and disposal baggage can now be bought for a fraction of the cost — albeit in other colors. “Is this a authentic creation? No,” it explained. “It is no shock that there are no women at the rear of the Pinky but two males, who have no working experience of employing sanitary solutions.”
Ritterswuerden and Eugen Raimkulow revealed a video on Wednesday addressing the criticism.
“In no way did we suggest to advise that menstruation is a thing disgusting,” they explained, introducing: “We realise that we have not totally taken on board distinct sights on the subject matter.”