Saturday, May 15

Special! ‘Drishyam 2’ runs into trouble authorized fit filed in opposition to its producer | Hindi Film News

Special! ‘Drishyam 2’ runs into trouble authorized fit filed in opposition to its producer | Hindi Film News

ETimes was the initial to report that ‘Drishyam 2’ (February 24, 2021) is likely to be produced. Its formal announcement which also reported that Kumar Mangat will helm it with Panorama Studios arrived only this early morning. We now have it that ‘Drishyam 2’ has run into rough temperature. Viacom 18 Movement Pics, who co-developed the very first component starring Ajay Devgn, Tabu and Ishita Dutta in main roles with Mangat, have lawfully objected against Mangat’s go as they claim that the film’s rights belong to them also.

‘Drishyam 2’ starred Malayalam superstar Mohanlal and a couple recent experiences experienced that Ajay Devgn and Tabu will reprise their roles in the Hindi sequel of ‘Drishyam’. The initial element in Hindi was released in 2015, directed by late filmmaker Nishikant Kamat and produced by Viacom 18 Motion Images, Panorama Studios and Kumar Mangat

A resource claims, “Viacom 18 Motion Shots have instructed Mangat that the franchise’s rights belong to them way too, and hence, he can’t dissociate himself and make the 2nd part on his own or with another person else. The incredibly actuality that Mangat still went forward to set up the phase for it has irked them and that’s why, they have submitted a authorized criticism towards him. The to start with listening to of the situation in query is going to be held, pretty before long.”

When contacted, Mangat did not choose our phone calls. Just after a whilst, he started out responding to text messages and mentioned that it is now official that he is building the movie with Panorama Studios. We wrote to him stating that we are aware of his tie-up with Panorama Studios and he must simply just offer you us his consider on the Viacom 18 Movement Pictures’ ire, but Mangat went silent following that.

Viacom 18 Motion Photos remained unavailable for comment.

Source (important)